More News & Comment

Article Categories

expand | close tree

Add us to your Google desktop:

Add to Google

Asylum seekers cost us £millions more

The first quarter of 2008 saw applications from asylum seekers rise by SIXTEEN per cent on the same period last year.
In contrast, applications to the rest of the EU actually FELL by 10%.

Why?

Blears not noticing immigrantsIs nobody in the British government giving out the message across the world that we are no longer encouraging applications for asylum? …the message that the British people don’t want any more asylum seekers?

If not, why not?
Which part of ‘no more asylum seekers’ and ‘no more immigrants’ does the Home Office not understand? How many times do we have to say it?

Apart from the negative and divisive effect they have on our society, in the current economic climate we can’t afford it.

The Home Office Asylum Statistics report shows that the numbers amount to 6595 for the quarter, excluding the applicants’ dependants.   Of these, some 69% were claiming for free accommodation & subsistence as well – not just for us to allow them in.   So the British taxpayer would be paying their rent, food and living expenses indefinitely while they ‘integrated’ into our society – and we know how successful that has been.

Of these, according to the Home Office,  1,875 applications were granted such support – only 1% down on the same period last year, despite the public outcry against asylum seekers – projecting a total of around 7,500 people receiving financial support from us in 2008 and beyond, for heaven knows how long.

And that’s just those who’ve turned up in England this year, never mind previous years.  These are of course the official asylum applications, and don’t include the hordes of illegal immigrants and expanded-EU Eastern Europeans also coming into the country and presenting themselves for benefits and accommodation.

Read more of Asylum seekers cost us £millions more »»

  • Share/Bookmark

Milibama for PM…?

We liked this – Miliband does look a little strange, even robotic at times.
Do we see him as PM? The British Citizen says ‘no’, but he’s a better option for ordinary folk than the Toff!

From anorak.co.uk:

DAVID Miliband would be Labour Leader. David Miliband would be leader of the Opposition (surely Prime Minister? -Ed)

David Miliband is for Change, just like Barack Obama. You don’t suppose…

“Labour facing civil war”, according to the Daily Mail.miliband-obama David Miliband And Barack Obama: Separated At Birth

“Brown furious over Miliband treachery”, says the Daily Express. “Gordon Brown was ‘incandescent’ with rage over a challenge to his authority…” Voice call the foreign secretary “condescending”, “patronising” and “crappy”.

“Brains versus Brown” says the Sun.

The Telegraph’s Ivan Lewis says “timidity and incremental change will not deal with the way people feel right now”.

The Mirror’s Bob Roberts – says Brown will annoint Miliband as his heir apparent, thereby avoiding a leadership challenge now. Like the Soviets used to do.

Picture: Poldraw



  • Share/Bookmark
Get Adobe Flash playerPlugin by wpburn.com wordpress themes