"Which flat you want? Nummer 33 or Nummer 45? You want rice wi' dat?"

Apart from the fact that they ran a large credit card fraud operation which spread across the world – bad enough in itself – how on EARTH did a gang of illegal Chinese immigrants get free benefit handouts and a council flat in Walworth, London?

There must be thousands of low-paid and other eligible BRITISH families in the Southwark area who should have been living there, rather than these scum.

Southwark is the parliamentary constituency of Lib Dem big cheese Simon Hughes, and the council itself is run by Labour and Lib Dem councillors, so how do they justify their local housing and benefits policy?

Questions need to be asked and Southwark Council held accountable for this cock-up.

This part of the story will probably be buried, but it shouldn’t be.

How many other illegal immigrants and  criminals have council flats in London or anywhere else in Britain when they shouldn’t even be in the country, never mind getting benefits from the British taxpayer?   Now they HAVE been caught, we’ll no doubt be paying for them to stay in our overcrowded prisons, too, rather than getting their own country to bang them up at their expense.

Do YOU want to join us in trying to stop this nonsense happening?
Why not write to your local council under the Freedom of Information Act and find out how many people of overseas birth are being given housing and benefits in YOUR area?
Write to your MP, too and demand action.

Don’t let Britain carry on being a pushover for the whole world to screw us for free money and housing when we need to help our own people.

Some useful links to help you make your voice heard:

www.writetothem.com

www.theyworkforyou.com

www.parliament.uk

So Pakistan’s High Commissioner to the UK, Wajid Shamsul Hasan, thinks that Pakistan already ‘does enough’ to prevent terrorist students entering the UK.

Well, he won’t mind if we ban ALL Pakistan nationals from entering the UK until further notice, then.

After all, why should the British taxpayer pay for costly screening and monitoring of his countrymen?  The amount we may earn in university and college course fees is no doubt MORE than offset by the COST to Britain of administration, surveillance and monitoring of his would-be terrorist fanatics.

We have no obligation to allow them entry and we can do without the hassle they cause us.

Apart from Pakistani students on fake or trumped-up visas, who have no intention of studying anything other than how to bomb and kill our citizens, we don’t need more visitors, tourists or ‘businessmen’ from Pakistan, period.  A large number don’t return after their studies or their ‘visit’  in any case – which breaks the terms of their visa and which goes largely unreported and unenforced, too.

And these are only the ones we KNOW about.
Who knows (the Home Office / Borders Agency certainly doesn’t) how many enter the UK illegally in the back of trucks or as visiting ‘relatives’ of those who are already here?

The only way in future we should be prepared to allow Pakistanis entry is if their government vouches for them and takes responsibility for their actions, both financially and morally.

So the ball is back in your court, Mr Commissioner.
If you’re not prepared to vouch 100% for your own citizens, then we’re not prepared to allow them in to kill ours.

Write to your MP now and object to any further students entering this country from Pakistan.

Boris has suggested that he’s in favour of an amnesty for illegal immigrants, the key word being ILLEGAL. They entered our country illegally, they live and work here illegally, and many are claiming financial and healthcare benefits either directly or often indirectly through supposedly legal immigrants we’ve already let in – all at the expense of the British taxpayer.
That’s you and me. Our money. Our jobs. Our health services.
So once again we have an upper-class toff showing absolutely no understanding of the lives and concerns of ordinary people, trying to kid us that he does, and now showing his true colours.
We all thought he was harmless of course – a lovable buffoon – and he’s played on that for over a year, but he needs to show he’s a serious public servant, not the Pied Piper of City Hall.  We don’t need him leading an endless stream of illegal immigrant ‘rats’ through London and up the steps of City Hall to claim their free benefits, National Insurance number and ‘Buy-one-get-one-free’ citizenships (they always bring their partners and kids, of course).
They haven’t paid anything into our system, so why should they get a free ride to the front of the queue, courtesy of Boris Johnson?

Strangely in support of Boris, one of the journalists at the Guardian is suggesting that this might be a good idea. To quote Rahila Gupta: “…this amnesty will leave 700,000 people better off. It will mean a life free from fear of deportation. They will have the protection of employment laws, including the minimum wage, and can even campaign for the London living wage of £7.45 per hour”.
Oh, and who’ll be paying for these lucky 700,000 people?  Boris Johnson? Rahila Gupta? Guardian readers? We don’t think it will be the liberal-minded and politically-correct members of our society who will lose their comfortable jobs to foreigners.
No, it’ll be us – ordinary British workers struggling to get by in the mess that politicians and greedy bankers have got us into. Dumping on us from above while we get shafted from the illegal migrants below.
Nothing ever changes… unless we stand up to this nonsense.

There may be an economic point to be made about the cost of policing borders and tracking down illegals, but we’d rather tighten the laws, increase severely the punishment of illegals and reinforce our policing to CATCH and DEPORT them as soon as possible. They may then get the message and stop queuing up in their droves in France, looking for the next truck to get them over here.

Contact your MP about this ridiculous move for amnesty and make your voice heard

AND sign the official petition to Gordon Brown by clicking here.

Like politicians you mean, David?   We agree.

As if giving the jobs to any foreigners at all wasn’t bad enough.

To make matters worse, we don’t appear to have done anything at all to expel them from the UK.  Only 35 out of 7,729 of the immigrants have been deported so far.

3,275 of those used a false name or National Insurance number when applying for jobs, according to information revealed in answers to Parliamentary questions.

The Home Office was criticised more than a year ago in 2007, when it was ‘discovered’ that basic checks were not being done to see if job applicants were entitled to work in the UK.

It seems that twelve illegals were actually approved for security jobs with the Metropolitan Police, including one found to be guarding the Prime Minister’s car.  

Perhaps with the state of the country as it is, Brown couldn’t be sure that a British guard would actually bother to protect him from his own citizens, never mind terrorists?

The following is an extract and summary of the proceedings against just ONE illegal immigrant, who was discovered in 1993 and it took FIFTEEN YEARS to decide he should be locked up, then released and then locked up again.   

The case of  Abu Qatada, aka Omar Mohammed Othman:

1. The appellant arrived in the United Kingdom on 16th September 1993 (when the Tories were in power) with his wife and three children on forged United Arab Emirates passports. He claimed asylum on arrival and was granted refugee status on 30th June 1994.
He was given four years leave to enter.

On 17th January 2001 the Secretary of State certified that he was a risk to national security and issued a notice of intention to deport.
The notice was not served at that time, because the appellant “went to ground“.

On 23rd October 2002 he was detained and issued with a certificate under section 21 of the Anti-terrorism, Crime and Security Act 2001 and served with the notice of intention to deport.
He appealed against it.
His appeal was dismissed by SIAC on 8th March 2004.

He was released on “immigration bail” (?) on 11th March 2005 and on the following day served with a Control Order under the Prevention of Terrorism Act 2005.
On 11th August 2005, he was served with a fresh notice of intention to deport on the ground that his presence in the United Kingdom was “not conducive to the public good” and detained under immigration powers.

His appeal against the notice was dismissed by SIAC on 5th March 2007.
SIAC found that he was a threat to national security, principally on the ground that he encouraged other extremists to commit acts of terrorism by providing religious sanction for their deeds. He was found to have long standing associations with other terrorist groups, including Al Qaeda. He was also found to have ready access to money and false documents for the purpose facilitating terrorism.

2. In April 2008, his appeal to the Court of Appeal was allowed, on safety on return grounds. He applied for bail.
On 8th May 2008 SIAC decided that, in principle, he should be admitted to bail on stringent terms, including a twenty two hour curfew and a full package of restrictions upon his ability to communicate with others.
At that date, the Court of Appeal had refused permission to the Secretary of State to appeal to the House of Lords.

An application for permission to the Appellate Committee was outstanding. The Commission accepted that the grounds upon which permission was sought were arguable, but that it could not simply ignore what had happened in the Court of Appeal. The fact that he had succeeded in his appeal was treated as of very great significance.
Nevertheless, the Commission accepted that the appellant represented a continuing and significant risk to national security and that there was a current and significant risk of absconding.
3. The appellant was released on 17th June 2008 to live at an address with his family in West London. On the morning of Saturday 8th November 2008, he was (finally!) detained at his home and taken to Belmarsh Prison.
The Secretary of State contends that the Commission should conclude that, if he was readmitted to bail, he would be “likely to break any condition on which he was released”, so that the Commission should direct that he be detained under paragraph 24(3) of Schedule 2 to the Immigration Act 1971.

Postscript:
The home secretary, Jacqui Smith (who?), said she was pleased that Qatada’s bail had been revoked:
“He poses a significant threat to our national security and I am pleased that he will be detained pending his deportation, which I’m working hard to secure.”
Qatada was taken back to Belmarsh prison in east London, but is expected to be moved to Long Lartin maximum security prison in the near future.

HOW LONG WILL IT TAKE TO GET RID OF THIS MAN FOR GOOD?
ARE OUR LEGAL AND POLITICAL SYSTEMS SO INEPT THAT IT TAKES 15 YEARS TO GET NOWHERE WITH THIS?

…   and how much has it cost the taxpayer so far, ‘entertaining’ this parasite?

The situation beggars belief.      Petition your MP until something is done.