More News & Comment

Article Categories

expand | close tree

Add us to your Google desktop:

Add to Google

Another pay rise for the Saxe-Coburg-Gotha-von Battenbergs

"Ooh look, everyone, it's raining taxpayer money again. Isn't one lucky?"

"Ooh look, everyone, it's raining taxpayer money again. Isn't one lucky?"

The Royal Family is to be exempt from any cuts in public spending next year when its civil list funding is settled for the next 10 years, says The Guardian.

MPs will be powerless to reduce the £7.9m a year paid under the civil list because of an obscure deal struck between Buckingham Palace and the Treasury in 1972 when the current legislation governing royal finances was drawn up.  (Under the Tories, by any chance?  Oh yes – it was that old tosser, Edward Heath.)

Palace officials made clear earlier this summer that they are actually seeking a rise in the annual civil list payment to cover “increased costs” despite the fact that they currently have a £21m surplus in the reserves on the civil list account. Wonder what the interest is on that, ma’am…?

What a bunch of spongers.

Time to make them all redundant like a large number of us seem to be at the moment.

We hope they’ll have the good sense to go  before they’re pushed,  Oliver Cromwell-style.

We don’t need them and the morally disgusting values they represent.



  • Share/Bookmark

Tories desperate for Cameron to lose ‘toff’ image.
Boris gets away with it. We’re not fooled, either way

Official: Tory Dave not a toff (it says here...)If you read the Tory blog, ‘conservativehome‘, you’ll see they’re deluding themselves into thinking that David  ‘call me Dave’ Cameron has escaped his ‘toff’ tag just because Labour aren’t using it as a jibe now.
(Cameron is shown, left, next to his ancestor, King William IV – also known as ‘Silly Billy’ – who twice tried unsuccessfully to force a Tory government on the country, in 1832 and again in 1834/35.)

Cameron IS a toff in the traditional sense of the term because of his privileged background, and trying to shrug off the image is pointless. It is precisely because Cameron, Osborne and many other Tories have this privileged, upper-class experience of life – and an obvious vested interest in preserving it – that their claim to have the welfare of ordinary citizens at heart is so unconvincing.

Why would the Tories be so sensitive about the ‘toff’ thing if they weren’t desperately embarrassed about it in electoral terms?  They know it will lose them the votes of those who just can’t identify with their upper-class values, so they – and Dave – are trying to kid us that he’s one of us really.  That – in their own words – they’re not the ‘nasty party’ any more.   Trying to kid us that what Conservatives are interested in is mending our ‘broken society’.  Right…

Read more of Tories desperate for Cameron to lose ‘toff’ image.
Boris gets away with it. We’re not fooled, either way »»

  • Share/Bookmark

The 1984 miners’ strike – how things change in 25 years?

Citizen against citizen in the name of power and money, 1984There’s a lot in the news today about the 1984 Miners’ Strike
- a milestone in our history that seems like only yesterday.

Where did all that time go? How things have changed… or have they?
Few British mines and miners any more.
Few British steel plants and steel workers.
Few British manufacturers and manufacturing jobs.
It’s all been said before.
Now Britain’s gone to the bankers of this world,
never mind the dogs.

Are you old enough to remember the old ‘socialist’ Labour Party versus the capitalist Tories?
Or the ‘militant’ trade unions versus the poor employers?
The ‘evil empires’ of Communist Russia and China v. the good and peaceful West?
All that’s history, now.
Like Cavaliers v. Roundheads, Protestants v. Catholics, Mods v. Rockers.
In the current climate, we’re even tempted to say “those were the days…”. At least you knew where you stood.

So what
have we learned since 1984?
After all, some things NEVER seem to change…
We still vote for the same old politicians and political parties, giving them absolute power to mis-spend our taxes on whatever suits their mis-guided political interests (or paymasters) and then to arrest us if we object.
Like turkeys voting for Christmas…

We still allow a divisive ruling class to exist in our society – the lords and ladies, princes and princesses, knights and queens – as if we were in some kind of fairytale kingdom. Many corrupt, most barmy and all self-seeking. (For more on this theme, see our ‘Monarchy?’ article.)

We still let big business dictate what we can buy, at what price, and on whatever terms they see fit to impose:  food, water, gas, electricity, transport, housing, banking… you name it. All in the interest of ‘free markets’ and ‘competition’ rather than making sure everyone has a fair and decent standard of living – and a job – in our ‘civilised’ western democracy.
Is this REALLY what we want for ourselves in the 21st century?

But wait a moment. Is there a common thread running through all of these things?

Could it be anything to do with the politicians and the rich using the powers of State to divide and control us?
Removing our right to protest against those to whom WE gave power in the first place?
The right to proper free speech? (…not just the usual whimper of middle-class journalists, more concerned with how clever they are than wanting to CHANGE anything – heaven forbid).
REAL free speech, REAL freedom and REAL democracy – not the poor imitations we ‘re fobbed off with at the moment?
The right to strike, protest and to REMOVE any government that doesn’t represent its own citizens?

More importantly, are we too repressed to CHANGE anything after centuries of putting up with the ruling classes and being force-fed with their IMITATION democracy?
Are we too ‘British’… too ‘civilised’ to kick up a fuss?

Whether we compare 2009 to 1984, 1884,  or even 1684, the British people are still exploited by the same self-seeking politicians, ‘aristocrats’ and the rich: all of whom have gained power and wealth for centuries at our expense.
Things will never change unless we MAKE them change, and for good this time.
After all, the French don’t put up with it – and haven’t done so since la Revolution.   Why should we?
It’s a big idea, and it won’t happen overnight, but it can be done.


  • Share/Bookmark

Giving away our money: charity begins at home

Free British money for foreigners“The UK government will give £30m to help rebuild damaged and destroyed homes, schools, and hospitals in Gaza, International Development Secretary Douglas Alexander announced today.“
This brings the total response to the humanitarian crisis in Gaza to nearly £47m since the conflict began. Are they kidding? What has Gaza got to do with us? What on EARTH is this government doing, at a time of extreme financial crisis, giving away British taxpayers’ money to foreigners?! Why isn’t this £47million going to newly-unemployed British workers and their families, or to create new jobs for them? If anyone wants to send THEIR money VOLUNTARILY to Palestinians, refugees, Martians or anyone else, let them do it. Just don’t allow the Government to be so free and easy with OUR money, and to spend it without OUR agreement and consent.
If YOU have some spare money you don’t need – unfortunately, most of us don’t – then go ahead… here’s the place to send it. Or preferably here.
BUT IF YOU OBJECT TO YOUR TAX MONEY GOING OVERSEAS, SIGN THE e-PETITION BELOW
, which can be found on the Prime Minister’s ‘Number 10′ website.

http://petitions.number10.gov.uk/BritishPoorFirst

…………………………………………………………………………

  • Share/Bookmark
Get Adobe Flash playerPlugin by wpburn.com wordpress themes